Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
<--Please Select Department-->
First Advisor's Name
Tatiana Kostadinova
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Chair
Second Advisor's Name
Eduardo Gamarra
Second Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Third Advisor's Name
Kyle Mattes
Third Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Milena Neshkova
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Keywords
Populism, Opposition, Turkey, Hungary
Date of Defense
4-17-2023
Abstract
Populism has garnered significant scholarly attention in recent decades, with the literature focusing on both the demand and supply sides of populism. However, few studies explore the significance of opposition when populists are in power. This dissertation investigates the opposition strategies to counter incumbent populist leaders in Turkey and Hungary, examining the challenges posed by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Viktor Orbán, respectively. By concentrating on the exclusionary aspect of populism, this study aims to analyze the challenges faced by opposition actors due to populist leaders' efforts to skew the playing field. To achieve this, populists in power exclude certain groups symbolically by using polarizing rhetoric, which reinforces the "us versus them" notion; politically by changing the constitution to limit the opposition's competitiveness; and materially through clientelism, such as dominating traditional media by promoting pro-government ownership to silence opposition voices. While inclusionary and exclusionary populism has been widely studied, few studies systematically scrutinize the opposition's strategies toward symbolic, political, and material exclusion. This dissertation contends that the opposition counters symbolic exclusion by employing non-polarizing discourses, political exclusion by forming broad alliances, and material exclusion by using the social media. By examining the dynamic relationship between populists and the opposition, this research seeks to fill the gap in the literature concerning the opposition's role in resisting populism, while also contributing to the literature on authoritarian successor parties within the opposition. The study employs a comparative analysis of Turkey and Hungary, focusing on right-wing populist parties, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Hungarian Civic Alliance (Fidesz). Additionally, the dissertation investigates how populist incumbents erode democracy and push their countries towards authoritarianism over time. To test the hypotheses, the dissertation utilizes case studies, online newspaper archives, existing datasets, an original Facebook dataset, and semi-structured interviews with opposition party officials and experts in the field.
Identifier
FIDC011087
ORCID
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4073-8985
Recommended Citation
Hekimci, Dilara C., "Opposition Strategies Against Populist Exclusion in Turkey and Hungary" (2023). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5245.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/5245
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).