Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
Political Science
First Advisor's Name
John F. Clark
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Co-Chair
Second Advisor's Name
Harry D. Gould
Second Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Co-Chair
Third Advisor's Name
Hannibal Travis
Third Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Richard S. Olson
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Fifth Advisor's Name
Oren B. Stier
Fifth Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Keywords
Genocide, Mass Political Violence, The Holocaust, Rwanda, Soviet Union, ISIS, Cambodia, Congo, China, Chinese Civil War, Darfur
Date of Defense
12-3-2018
Abstract
This dissertation presents a new conceptual framework for understanding genocide and mass political violence. I build upon existing theories of mass violence that take into account motivations for committing mass atrocities, combine these with the task of counting civilian casualties, and propose a new framework based on the perpetrators’ socio-political standing in society. This model develops a four-part typology of perpetrators by examining the level of government participation and societal participation in the process of violence. Four patterns of perpetrators emerge from this deductive assessment of large-scale violence. These mass political violence perpetrator categories are: a) state perpetrators; b) state-society coalitions; c) state-sponsored groups; and d) non-state actors. Based on the evidence and analysis in this dissertation I found four central conclusions. First, perpetrator type implicitly limits the scope of violence and target group(s). Second, when assessing the severity and destructive power of each perpetrator category, we must use both absolute and relative thresholds. Neither on its own is sufficient for understanding why and how perpetrators target and eliminate vast segments of society. Third, based on this typological framework, there are variations between perpetrator categories (i.e., state perpetrators and state-society coalitions) and there is variation within each perpetrator category. The final conclusion is that scholars must question the so-called unitary role of the state when theorizing about genocide and mass political violence perpetrators. The role of state and society is not unitary nor as parsimonious as previous theories of mass violence suggest.
Identifier
FIDC007700
Recommended Citation
Karazsia, Zachary, "Genocide in the Modern Age: State-Society Relations in the Making of Mass Political Violence, 1900-2015" (2018). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4068.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/4068
Included in
Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, Other Political Science Commons
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).