Faculty Advisor
John Castillo
Faculty Advisor
Matthew Degennaro
Location
FIU Wellness & Recreation Center
Start Date
8-4-2019 10:00 AM
End Date
8-4-2019 12:00 PM
Session
Poster Session 1
Abstract
Aedes aegypti is the central vector for three main arboviruses that affect humans, dengue, chikungunya and zika. Since these diseases are globally widespread and have a major effect on the population, being able to reduce the vector population essential. Improving genome-editing efficiency in Aedes aegypti is one crucial step in understanding the control and transmission of these diseases. It is possible to create a gene drive system that would introduce a gene to diminish the population of Aedes aegypti, using CRISPR/Cas9, a genome-editing tool that allows for site-specific mutagenesis. Although CRISPR/Cas9 has made it accessible to mutagenize virtually any genome using Watson-Crick base pairing, there are still concerns on the precision of the Cas9 endonuclease. Studies have shown that organisms expressing Cas9 in the germline have higher prevalence of CRISPR activity rather than embryonic injection. Using this approach, we want to compare the mutagenic rates of Cas9 expressing strains to wild type. Specifically, we want to assess the wellness and rate of off-target effects, if any, present in the offspring. Here we use two germline Cas9 expressing strains, p11 and p6 to determine the rates of mutagenesis of the yellow gene between endogenously expressed Cas9 compared to recombinant protein injected in a wild type strain. Our preliminary data shows that there is a difference in Cas9 activity between the Orlando (wild type) line, p11 strain, and p6 strain. Cas9 activity in the Orlando strain was found to be at ~ 34.6%, while the p11 strain showed ~33.3%. As of current trials, the p6 line has yet to show Cas9 activity. If these strains are shown to have increased mutagenic rates, an insight on how to create a precise gene drive system could potentially support population control.
File Type
Poster
Improving the Genome Editing Efficiency in Aedes Aegypti
FIU Wellness & Recreation Center
Aedes aegypti is the central vector for three main arboviruses that affect humans, dengue, chikungunya and zika. Since these diseases are globally widespread and have a major effect on the population, being able to reduce the vector population essential. Improving genome-editing efficiency in Aedes aegypti is one crucial step in understanding the control and transmission of these diseases. It is possible to create a gene drive system that would introduce a gene to diminish the population of Aedes aegypti, using CRISPR/Cas9, a genome-editing tool that allows for site-specific mutagenesis. Although CRISPR/Cas9 has made it accessible to mutagenize virtually any genome using Watson-Crick base pairing, there are still concerns on the precision of the Cas9 endonuclease. Studies have shown that organisms expressing Cas9 in the germline have higher prevalence of CRISPR activity rather than embryonic injection. Using this approach, we want to compare the mutagenic rates of Cas9 expressing strains to wild type. Specifically, we want to assess the wellness and rate of off-target effects, if any, present in the offspring. Here we use two germline Cas9 expressing strains, p11 and p6 to determine the rates of mutagenesis of the yellow gene between endogenously expressed Cas9 compared to recombinant protein injected in a wild type strain. Our preliminary data shows that there is a difference in Cas9 activity between the Orlando (wild type) line, p11 strain, and p6 strain. Cas9 activity in the Orlando strain was found to be at ~ 34.6%, while the p11 strain showed ~33.3%. As of current trials, the p6 line has yet to show Cas9 activity. If these strains are shown to have increased mutagenic rates, an insight on how to create a precise gene drive system could potentially support population control.
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Comments
**Abstract Only**