Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
Business Administration
First Advisor's Name
Cynthia LeRouge
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee chair
Second Advisor's Name
Lina Bouayad
Second Advisor's Committee Title
Committee member
Third Advisor's Name
Tala Mirzaei
Third Advisor's Committee Title
Committee member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Weidong Xia
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
Committee member
Fifth Advisor's Name
Weirui Wang
Fifth Advisor's Committee Title
Committee member
Keywords
chronic pain, chronic headache, digital health, consumer health informatics, instrument development, user engagement
Date of Defense
2-14-2023
Abstract
Positive user experience is crucial for technology end-users and software development companies. Even though a variety of factors can determine user experience, the personal relevance of technology plays one of the most critical roles in defining the nature of user experience with technology. Nevertheless, it is not completely clear what the personal relevance of technology entails or how to measure this construct. Clarifying and operationalizing the construct of personal relevance can benefit a wide range of contexts of technology use. Healthcare and digital health technologies (DHTs) seem to stand out remarkably. DHTs, such as mobile health applications and web-based programs, are gaining increasing attention in chronic disease self-management. User engagement, the major aspect of user experience with DHTs, is critical for driving health behavior changes and improving health outcomes. Yet, user engagement with DHTs remains problematic. The literature recognizes that creating personally relevant DHTs can be a possible solution to low user engagement, but no study conceptualizes and operationalizes this construct. Thus, this study aims to clarify and operationalize digital health relevance. We leverage the biopsychosocial model of health, which can explicate the healthcare user context in terms of biological, psychological, and social dimensions, to clarify and create a measurement instrument. The study consists of three phases. Phase 1 (construct definition and item generation) used 23 semi-structured interviews to explore the nature of the DHT’s relevance and create the item pool. Phase 2 (theoretical analysis) involved an expert panel of 7 individuals to establish the content validity of the item pool created in Phase 1. Finally, Phase 3 (psychometrical analysis) consisted of conducting closed-ended surveys to revise the preliminary version of the measurement instrument developed in Phase 2 and establish the construct validity. During Phase 3, we recruited 225 individuals who completed the survey and conducted PLS-SEM on survey data. Our study contributes to information systems, health informatics, and healthcare. First, our study provides conceptual clarity into the nature of technology relevance and, particularly, digital health relevance. Furthermore, our measurement instrument can be used to guide the design and development of DHTs for chronic conditions. Finally, patients and health providers can use our measurement instrument as a decision aid to select and prescribe DHTs that are most relevant to specific patients.
Identifier
FIDC011007
ORCID
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2842-1910
Recommended Citation
Durneva, Polina, "The Biopsychosocial Relevance of Digital Health Technologies for Self-management of Chronic Conditions: Instrument Development and Validation" (2023). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5316.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/5316
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).