Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
Cognitive Neuroscience
First Advisor's Name
Aaron T Mattfeld
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee chair
Second Advisor's Name
Timothy Allen
Second Advisor's Committee Title
Committee member
Third Advisor's Name
Fabian Soto
Third Advisor's Committee Title
Committee member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Kim Tieu
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
Committee member
Keywords
hippocampus, Striatum, mPFC, decision making, learning, memory
Date of Defense
7-28-2022
Abstract
In this dissertation, I investigate how the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex and striatum facilitate memory-guided decision making. While a great deal of human and animal research has been dedicated to solving this puzzle, much of this work has focused on “retrospective” mechanisms of this process. Although retrieval and deliberation are certainly fundamental elements of successful choice behavior, how these regions prospectively support memory-guided decision making is also worthy of further study. Here, I present: (1) elucidation of two distinct networks which support prospective and concurrent memory-guided behavior, (2) evidence hippocampal support to experience-based learning is a dynamic, evolving process, and (3) demonstration of prospective representational content using machine learning. In my first experiment, participants completed a visuospatial conditional associative task (vCAT1) in which correct conditional response was dependent on the preceding stimulus. Through both uni- and multivariate methods, I demonstrate evidence of two separate networks through which memory guides decision making behavior: (1) hippocampus (HPC), putamen (PUT), medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and other cortical regions which showed increased activation preceding successful conditional choice, and (2) dorsal anterior caudate (DAC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and other cortical regions, which exhibited increased activation during successful choice execution. In order to address how these regions and their collaborative contributions may evolve across learning, I employed two learning analyses to determine how HPC and DAC support early and late learning. I observed decreased activation for DAC as performance improved and selective involvement of the HPC for late, but not early learning. These findings demonstrate dynamic contributions of the HPC as learning develops. In my second experiment, participants completed a more complex visuospatial conditional associative task (vCAT2) to reduce ceiling effects and prevent alternating response set. Here, I collected data for purposes of conducting a multivoxel pattern analysis to investigate neurobiological representations of prospective memory. Classifier accuracy for both FFA and PPA was better than would be expected by chance, but no statistically significant relationship was observed between classifier and subject performance. These findings provide evidence for prospective representational content which supports memory-guided decision making processes.
Identifier
FIDC010940
ORCID
0000-0003-0034-4586
Previously Published In
Hamm, A. G., & Mattfeld, A. T. (2019). Distinct neural circuits underlie prospective and concurrent memory-guided behavior. Cell Reports, 28(10), 2541–2553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.002
Recommended Citation
Renfro, Amanda G., "Distinct Temporal and Mechanistic Contributions of the Hippocampus, Striatum, and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Facilitate Memory-Guided Decision-Making" (2022). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5176.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/5176
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).