Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
Economics
First Advisor's Name
Hakan Yilmazkuday
First Advisor's Committee Title
committee chair
Second Advisor's Name
Alejandro Arrieta
Second Advisor's Committee Title
co-committee chair
Third Advisor's Name
Mihaela Pintea
Third Advisor's Committee Title
committee member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Sheng Guo
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
committee member
Keywords
healthcare economics, home-visiting programs, smoking cessation
Date of Defense
6-23-2022
Abstract
This dissertation follows a three-essay format. The first chapter examines the impact of a home visiting program on medical expenses and healthcare services utilization implemented by a healthcare maintenance organization. The evaluation uses administrative claims data to estimate the six-month average expenditures following program enrollment. The estimation is carried out by applying a difference-in-differences method to compare spend for patients enrolled in the program to a control group. Estimation using matching methods to address any potential confounding bias is also applied to support estimates and confirms findings. The estimation finds that the program increases average medical expenditures by as much as 30% in the six-month period following enrollment, suggesting it is an ineffective cost control strategy.
The second chapter explores the use of individuals' preferences regarding their willingness to accept payments to quit smoking to identify and target interventions for smoking cessation during pregnancy. Unlike prior studies, which focus on individuals' willingness to pay for and use smoking cessation products, quit rates are estimated using individuals' willingness to accept a stream of payments in exchange for smoking cessation. Estimation via regression analysis techniques finds that when individuals are willing to accept payments, delivery of a subsequent monetary incentive can increase quit rates by an average of 20%. These results suggest that willingness to accept monetary incentives to quit smoking is an effective mechanism to identify participants with a higher chance of successful smoking cessation attempts.
The third chapter builds on the prior chapter by analyzing the reliability of using self-reported quit rates to measure campaign effectiveness, comparing them to urine cotinine levels measured using laboratory-based tests. Public health campaigns often do not have access to laboratory test results to measure the participants' urine cotinine levels because of the associated costs and the complexity of obtaining testing samples. The use of self-reported indicators offers a low-cost mechanism to measure campaign success with significantly easier implementation of results monitoring. Findings show that self-reports overstate quit rates by an average of 11%, providing a frame of reference that allows campaign officials to interpret self-reported data to evaluate campaign effectiveness and performance.
Identifier
FIDC010902
ORCID
Recommended Citation
Chinchilla, Esteban, "Three Essays on Healthcare Economics" (2022). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5095.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/5095
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).