Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
Public Affairs
First Advisor's Name
Allan Rosenbaum
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee chair
Second Advisor's Name
Milena Neshkova
Second Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Third Advisor's Name
Keith Revell
Third Advisor's Committee Title
Committee member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Richard Tardanico
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
committee member
Keywords
Decision-making, culture, change, equity, inclusion
Date of Defense
6-28-2022
Abstract
This dissertation is a study of challenges to the development of democratic equity and inclusion in administration. It examines Woodrow Wilson’s and the 1968 Minnowbrook Conference participants’ thoughts about public administration in environments of political constraint and crisis. The study consists of four essays. Essay 1 is an overview of Wilson’s concerns for the development of administration and thoughts on a prescribed role for the study. Essay 2 presents an overview of the Minnowbrook Conference concerns, including the traditional political rationality. Essay 3 surveys contemporary equity and inclusion literature and assesses the linkages to the ideas of Wilson and the Minnowbrook Conference. Essay 4 examines the thoughts that describe the reasons for the slow onset of the racial equity research agenda. The dissertation posits a link between the Wilson and Minnowbrook concerns and the external and internal constraints affecting the discipline. It also provides a set of guidelines on how the field can address the democratic equity and inclusion issues through training, theory, and practice.
Key points of the study are, first, Wilson (1887) points to the relevance of pre-enlightenment rationality, focus on Constitutional issues, and political neglect of administrative development. Second, Wilson lists economic, political, and social factors of racial inequity and exclusion. As such, his critical theory sets a normative development goal for the PA field to achieve. Third, the Minnowbrook Conference ideas are a second step toward addressing equity and inclusion issues and helping overcome internal constraints faced by the field. Fourth, recent PA scholarship provides evidence that the discipline is taking a third step toward operationalizing social equity and inclusion. Thus, this dissertation provides a descriptive model that traces the challenges to achieving culture change. Normatively, this work suggests a potential for a policy environment in which PA scholars and practitioners feel free to raise and address social equity issues.
Identifier
FIDC010795
ORCID
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-1024
Recommended Citation
Francis, Dale, "Decision-making Culture and Change: Toward Democratic Equity and Inclusion" (2022). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5003.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/5003
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).