Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
Public Affairs
First Advisor's Name
Howard Frank
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee chair
Second Advisor's Name
Hai Guo
Second Advisor's Committee Title
Co-chair
Third Advisor's Name
Shaoming Cheng
Third Advisor's Committee Title
committee member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Florence George
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
committee member
Keywords
public affairs, public policy, public administration
Date of Defense
4-1-2022
Abstract
FISCAL TRANSPARENCY AND FISCAL OUTCOMES: IS THERE A CONNECTION?
This dissertation answers whether a connection exists between an American State Government’s (ASG’s) level of fiscal transparency and attainment of improved fiscal outcomes. Improved fiscal transparency is normatively positive and expected to be rewarded by bond rating agencies with better ratings resulting in lower borrowing costs. Likewise, improved fiscal transparency is expected to lead to lower levels of debt. Yet, no empirical evidence exists to bolster such assertions.
Specifically, two interrelated research questions are addressed. Research Question one focuses on why some states have greater levels of fiscal transparency? This question distills to an exploration of possible drivers of fiscal transparency at the state level. Research Question two answers whether higher levels of fiscal transparency in ASGs are associated with improved fiscal outcomes, which are measured by a state’s yearly bond ratings as well as their ratios of debts and Domestic State Product (DSP).
The quantitative analysis covers four fiscal years (FY 2015-18) for each of the 50 ASGs. Given the ordered nature of the fiscal transparency variables, estimation of research questions is by a series of Panel Ordered Logistic Regression Models. Fiscal transparency variables are derived from the Volcker Alliance’s Truth and Integrity in State Budgeting Project (Volcker Alliance, 2015). Grades are proxy indicators for explaining the different dimensions of Fiscal Transparency for ASGs. The five dimensions are Budget forecasting, Budget Maneuvers, Legacy Costs, Reserve Funds and Transparency.
Findings are nuanced. Professionalism of managers is an important determinant of fiscal transparency for ASGs. In accordance with theory, this indicator is positive and significant in all models explaining fiscal transparency. Moralist political culture is significant in most models as well. Most importantly, the level of fiscal transparency is an important indicator in determining the attainment of improved bond rating and Debt/DSP ratio. Insertion of this information into real-world scenarios for ASGs provides practitioners with insights on what, if any payoffs accrue for increasing fiscal transparency. Regression results also provide indicators of potential dollar savings to states that maximize disclosure.
Identifier
FIDC010701
Recommended Citation
Quispe, Merlene Patrice, "Fiscal Transparency and Fiscal Outcomes: Is There a Connection?" (2022). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4958.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/4958
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).