Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
International Relations
First Advisor's Name
Dr. John F. Clark
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Chair
Second Advisor's Name
Dr. John G. Oates
Second Advisor's Committee Title
committee member
Third Advisor's Name
Dr. Jin Zeng
Third Advisor's Committee Title
committee member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Dr. Hilary Jones
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
committee chair
Keywords
#Africa, regionalism, sub regional integration, regional economic communities (RECs), Pan-Africanism, Namibia, South Sudan, Liberia, economic development, ECOWAS, East African Community (EAC), Southern African Development Community (SADC).
Date of Defense
6-7-2021
Abstract
This dissertation advances new arguments about regional integration in Africa. It sheds light on the roles of regional economic communities (RECs) for small-economy states in Africa by examining the benefits and drawbacks of participating in such regional groups for both the small states themselves and their ruling regimes. The study suggests that RECs, rather than being agents of economic development, facilitate regime-boosting agendas of neopatrimonial regimes, promote a sense of (false) sovereignty, and entrench the political elite’s capture of the states.
The significance is threefold. First, it suggests that RECs provide an extension of neopatrimonial networks, which expand state-capture by specific political elites at regional levels. Neopatrimonialism refers to the lack of distinction between private and public interests in the state apparatus. For instance, in Africa’s neopatrimonial states, the political and economic interests of the elites largely determine state interests. Although the state appears to exist as a standalone neutral legal entity, private interest groups, who use their positions of power to amass wealth and influence, often engulf it. The political elites’ regional interests become the drivers of their states’ official foreign policies. Second, my study contextualizes regionalism. It emphasizes that RECs are constructions of new identities of a state, as visualized by the existing regimes. RECs offer opportunities to orient national identities, construct solidarity narratives and pursue diplomatic efforts that entrench the governing regimes’ ideological legitimacy to rule. Lastly, my research challenges the assumption that RECs will solve the small states’ development problems.
Identifier
FIDC010288
Recommended Citation
Kodero, Cliff, "Rethinking the Functions of Regional Economic Communities: Why African Small States Join and Remain in Sub-Regional Entities" (2021). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4791.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/4791
Included in
African Studies Commons, Economic Theory Commons, Growth and Development Commons, Organization Development Commons, Political Economy Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Regional Economics Commons
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).