Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
Public Affairs
First Advisor's Name
Milena Neshkova
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Chair
Second Advisor's Name
Howard Frank
Second Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Third Advisor's Name
Allan Rosenbaum
Third Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Fourth Advisor's Name
Benjamin Baez
Fourth Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Member
Keywords
Town/gown, Local Government, Higher Education, Collaboration, Engagement, Anchor Institutions
Date of Defense
3-28-2019
Abstract
This dissertation analyzes the engagement between universities and their respective municipalities. Although a sizable amount of research has explored relationships between town and gown, we still lack a clear understanding of why engagement works better between some universities and municipalities but not for others. This dissertation argues that university engagement with local governments, while a necessary and increasingly important part of institutional activities, cannot be effective unless it is done in earnest collaboration with the localities. Short of collaboration, engagement between town and gown only exists as a unilateral relationship, which despite its actual benefits, undermines trust and can cause frustration for both parties. The study contributes to the growing literature advocating a shift away from a paternalistic diffusion of resources from universities toward localities by analyzing a collaborative approach to engagement.
Employing a cross-sectional study of 122 universities and municipalities, this dissertation examines how the collaborative capacity of each of the two parties impacts their perceptions of engagement and collaboration. Additionally, using 62 local government-university pairs, the study explores the factors that affect the proclivity of parties to agree on their levels of engagement and consider it mutually beneficial. Finally, semi-structured interviews with university administrators and local government officials sheds light on how the understanding of engagement might differ between the two institutions and explores the factors that can help or hinder the collaboration process.
The quantitative analysis revealed that leadership and trust are positively associated with engagement, while the measure of shared vision was most positively associated with collaboration. Qualitative findings demonstrate that town-gown engagement often carries a different meaning, which is largely dependent on an institutional vantage point. Overall, the findings of this dissertation establish that collaboration is the mechanism through which the independent parties of institutions of higher education and local governments work together to achieve results that they would not otherwise be able to independently achieve on their own.
Identifier
FIDC007660
Recommended Citation
Cueto, Vivian Gonzalez, "How Town Engages Gown: Engagement and Collaboration Between Local Governments and Institutions of Higher Education" (2019). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4023.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/4023
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).