Document Type
Thesis
Degree
Master of Science (MS)
Major/Program
Music Education
First Advisor's Name
Carolyn Fulton
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Chair
Second Advisor's Name
Deborah Burton
Third Advisor's Name
Greg Martin
Date of Defense
11-23-2004
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine which of the two methods is more appropriate to teach pitch discrimination to Grade 6 choral students to improve sight-singing note accuracy. This study consisted of three phases: pre-testing, instruction and post-testing. During the four week study, the experimental group received training using the Kodaly method while the control group received training using the traditional method. The pre and post tests were evaluated by three trained musicians. The analysis of the data utilized an independent t-test and a paired t-test with the methods of teaching (experimental and control) as a factor. Quantitative results suggest that the experimental subjects, those receiving Kodaly instruction at post-treatment showed a significant improvement in the pitch accuracy than the control group. The specific change resulted in the Kodaly method to be more effective in producing accurate pitch in sight-singing.
Identifier
FI14032308
Recommended Citation
Amkraut, Merissa, "A comparison of the Kodaly method and the traditional method to determine pitch accuracy in grade 6 choral sight-singing" (2004). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1281.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1281
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).