Document Type
Conference Proceedings
Abstract
Objective: To present the results of artificial intelligence models for estimating Type 2 diabetes risk and to Identify the accuracy and benefits of each methodology in existing datasets. Methods: The methods used include the multivariate logistics regression, a Decision tree classifier, a random forest, a support vector machine, an artificial neural network, and a model based on a deep neural network architecture known as TabTransformer, which extends the self-attention mechanism, initially developed for translation and language tasks, to tabular data. The models were initially pretrained with a portion (80%) of data available from Jackson Hearth Study which is a cross-sectional study that was conducted in a sample population of African Americans (20 to 95 years) with and without diabetes (n=3,098). Selected risk factors associated with diabetes are based on the socioecological model. The models were then validated with 20% of the data, evaluated with ROC methodology. Results: The accuracy of the multi-logistic regression method was around 78%, SVM 77%, Decision Tree 75%, Random Fores 75%, ANN79%, and TabTransformer 80%. TabTransformer showed a better accuracy, better prediction of local factors, insensitivity to missing data, and online training capabilities. Conclusion: The proposed models enrich the original multi-logistics regression approach with improved accuracy, extra benefits include the easier way to develop the score, better prediction of local factors, insensitivity to missing data, and online training capabilities. All models are appropriate for the development of apps and integration with IT tools.
Recommended Citation
Hernandez Morales, Veronica D. and Quintero Restrepo, William F.
(2025)
"AI Applied to the generation of Type 2 Diabetes Risk Scores, Comparison of Methodologies,"
American Journal of Non-Communicable Diseases: Vol. 2:
Iss.
2, Article 25.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/ajncd/vol2/iss2/25
Included in
Community-Based Research Commons, Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, Health and Physical Education Commons, Health Communication Commons, Health Economics Commons, Health Psychology Commons, Medicine and Health Commons, Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons