Does expert psychological testimony improve juror sensitivity to lineup suggestiveness?
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Major/Program
Psychology
First Advisor's Name
Brian L. Cutler
First Advisor's Committee Title
Committee Chair
Second Advisor's Name
David A. Kravitz
Third Advisor's Name
Ronald P. Fisher
Fourth Advisor's Name
Gary Moran
Fifth Advisor's Name
Janat Parker
Sixth Advisor's Name
Rebecca Salokar
Date of Defense
5-17-1996
Abstract
Previous research has examined the validity of behavioral assumptions underlying the presumed effectiveness of safeguards against erroneous conviction resulting from mistaken eyewitness identification. In keeping with this agenda, this study examined juror sensitivity to lineup suggestiveness in the form of foil, instruction, and presentation biases and whether expert psychological testimony further sensitizes jurors to the factors that influence the likelihood of false identifications. One hundred and sixty jury eligible citizens watched versions of a videotaped trial that included information about the identification of the defendant by an eyewitness and that varied the suggestiveness of the eyewitness identification procedure. In addition, half of the mock-jurors heard the testimony of an expert psychologist regarding the factors that influence lineup suggestiveness. Mock-jurors rendered individual verdicts, rated the defendant's culpability and the suggestiveness and fairness of the identification procedure. Results indicated that jurors are somewhat sensitive to foil bias but are insensitive to instruction and presentation biases. No evidence was found to suggest that expert testimony leads to juror skepticism or juror sensitization. These results question the effectiveness of cross-examination and expert testimony as safeguards against erroneous convictions resulting from mistaken identification.
Identifier
FI14062253
Recommended Citation
Devenport, Jennifer Leigh, "Does expert psychological testimony improve juror sensitivity to lineup suggestiveness?" (1996). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2783.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/2783
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).