Document Type



Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)


Global and Sociocultural Studies

First Advisor's Name

Kevin Grove

First Advisor's Committee Title

Committee Chair

Second Advisor's Name

Gail Hollander

Second Advisor's Committee Title

Committee member

Third Advisor's Name

Roderick Neumann

Third Advisor's Committee Title

Committee member

Fourth Advisor's Name

Sean Hermanson

Fourth Advisor's Committee Title

Committee member


animal studies, human geography

Date of Defense



Being labeled feral is a death sentence. Making animals killable is a process rooted in histories of control and situated within contemporary iterations of social, political, and legal frameworks. The bureaucratic designation “feral” is used to justify the financed destruction of millions of animals per year. Yet, the designation of ferality is less an objective, biological, or ethological determination than a political determination made within a contested field of power relations in particular spaces and at particular historical moments. In Miami, the county-run animal shelter deploys ferality as a classification to structure their TNR program. This program, launched in the wake of controversies over shelter management practices, presents itself as a humane alternative that saves animal lives. However, this official narrative hinges on ‘no kill’ and ‘live release’ statistics. This dissertation will utilize work on assemblage and biopolitics in human geography, and specifically animal geographies, to question this narrative. Combining a more-than-human ethnography with a genealogy of ferality in Miami-Dade County’s animal shelter, I will show that ferality, as an animal management classification technology imposed on all cats, results in abstract generalizations about a heterogeneous group of animals and sacrifices individual animal well-being for the political goal of achieving high live-release rates. The result is a (failed) attempt to legitimize the liminal existence of ‘feral’ animals. This dissertation contributes to the understanding and consideration for multispecies coexistence in a changing world by highlighting hitherto underexplored experiences of individuals engaging with the implementation of government policies to manage ‘feral’ animals. The genealogy of ferality that I offer here is particularly helpful since feral life, by definition, is situated across the remnants of the nature-culture and wild-domestic binaries. ‘Ferality,’ in practice, is formulated and operationalized by different actors and at different scales. This topological approach to ferality increases our understanding of human-nonhuman relations in an era where the boundaries between pristine nature and human impact are indistinct, yet categories rooted in binary thinking such as ferality persists. Finally, this research extends beyond academic literature and engages in discussions with policymakers, government agencies, legislators, and public conversations about human-nonhuman coexistence.






Rights Statement

Rights Statement

In Copyright. URI:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).