The role of repeated attitudinal expressions in predicting juror behavior

Document Type



Master of Science (MS)



First Advisor's Name

Margaret Bull Kovera

First Advisor's Committee Title

Committee Chair

Second Advisor's Name

Christian A. Meissner

Third Advisor's Name

Kevin O'Neil

Date of Defense



Although the social cognitive literature has established that attitude accessibility mediates the attitude-behavior relationship, psycholegal studies have not included attitude accessibility measures when investigating the attitude-verdict relationship. This study investigates whether source and frequency of attitudinal expression moderate attitude accessibility (operationalized as response latency) and the attitude-verdict relationship. I manipulated the source of the voir dire questioning (judge vs. attorney) and the number of times (one vs. six) that jurors expressed their attitudes toward presumption of innocence (PI) and eyewitness testimony. Repeated expression significantly increased attitude accessibility for the PI attitude. For both attitudes, when accessibility was weak, the attitude-verdict correlation was weak and unaffected by source. Neither source nor frequency of expression influenced the strength of attitude-verdict correlations. Repeated expression influenced multiple ratings, however, including verdict, attitudes toward presumption of innocence and eyewitnesses, and participants' certainty threshold needed to convict.



This document is currently not available here.



Rights Statement

Rights Statement

In Copyright. URI:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).