Off-campus FIU users: To download campus-access content, please use the following link to log in to our proxy server with your FIU library username and password.
Non-FIU users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this content through interlibrary loan.
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Department
Accounting
Advisor's Name
Dasaratha Rama
Advisor's Title
Committee Co-Chair
Advisor's Name
Kannan Raghunandan
Advisor's Title
Committee Co-Chair
Advisor's Name
Suchismita Mishra
Advisor's Name
Abhijit Barua
Keywords
audit opinion, executive characteristics, Gender
Date of Defense
6-23-2009
Abstract
Auditors have come under increased scrutiny over the past several years about the growing number of client failures without a warning in the form of a going-concern modified (GCM) audit opinion. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 59 requires auditors to evaluate whether substantial doubt exists on an audit client’s ability to continue as a going concern (AICPA 1988). My dissertation consists of three essays.
For the three essays, I empirically investigate issues related to GCM audit opinions and executive characteristics. Specifically, I examine the impact of executive tenure and gender on the issuance of GCM audit opinions. In addition, my dissertation addresses two other unique issues. Given that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act represents an important watershed event in the history and regulation of the accounting profession, I provide evidence about auditors’ propensities to issue GCM audit opinions in the post-SOX period. Further, I also expand extant research in this area by using multiple outcomes and thus go beyond the traditional use of bankruptcy alone as a tool to evaluate auditors’ GCM opinion.
The results indicate that, after controlling for other financial characteristics, GCM audit opinions are significantly more likely for firms that have CFOs with short tenure and/or for firms with a female CFO or CEO. However, when examining the association between executive characteristics and two types of reporting errors, the results vary with the type of reporting error. Overall, the results provide evidence that executive characteristics are associated with auditors' reporting decisions.
Recommended Citation
Abdel Zaher, Angie M., "Executive Characteristics and Going Concern Opinions" (2009). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 93.
http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/93
