Document Type

Thesis

Degree

Master of Science

Department

Dietetics and Nutrition

Advisor's Name

Evelyn B. Enrione

Advisor's Title

Committee Chair

Advisor's Name

Zisca Dixon

Advisor's Name

Barbara Thomlison

Keywords

functional food, fortified, enriched, enhanced, processed, genetically modified, natural, processed

Date of Defense

3-22-2010

Abstract

The term “functional food” (FF) has a variety of definitions resulting in term ambiguity. It is unclear Registered Dietitians’ (RDs) understanding and practices about FF. A descriptive, cross-sectional study investigated RDs’ perceptions, attitudes and practices regarding FF. A national random sample (n=1800) of RDs was mailed a FF questionnaire, 385 (22%) responded. Given five definitions from food-nutrition authorities, the majority of RDs did not agree on a definition, although three-fourths (n=292, 75.8%) perceived fortified foods as FF. Registered Dietitians agreed FF could improve health (n=266, 69.1%), prevent disease (n=282, 73.2%) and treat clientele (n=246, 63.9%), however were neutral (41.6%) or disagreed (37.7%) FF were herbs, or equivalent to medicine (32.7%, 49.2% respectively). Most RDs (n=290, 75.9%) ate FF; fewer (n=231, 61.4%) professionally recommended them. Nearly all (n=353) indicated interest in learning about FF. Registered Dietitians revealed inconsistencies between their perceptions, attitudes and practices regarding FF. Professional education is needed to resolve discrepancies regarding FF.


Download

Files over 15MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "Save as..."

Share

COinS